Our Location
History
Culture
Habitat
Monitoring
Education
Bibliography
Salmon Links
News
H.I.T.S
Home
E-Mail
|
Eel River Salmon Restoration Project
|
THE PROPOSAL FOR LAND USE:
The South Fork Eel River watershed is part of the Eel River system located on the North
Coast of California in Humboldt and Mendocino Counties. The South Fork Eel River watershed
covers 440,572 acres with elevations ranging from 100 to 4,500 feet. It contains 713 miles of
stream, according to USGS maps. About 81 percent of the watershed is under private ownership.
It contains approximately 80 percent of the major stream miles (i.e., those with important fish
habitat) in the watershed. These private lands have been and are being used for intensive timber
harvesting, livestock grazing, and dispersed rural development.
|
 |
 |
State lands encompass about 12 percent of the South Fork Eel River watershed and are
mostly located within the boundaries of Humboldt Redwoods State Park. Bureau of Land
Management land comprises the remaining 7 percent of the watershed. Together, federal and
state lands contain approximately 20 percent of the major stream miles.
The 4,055 acre Angelo Coast Preserve is contiguous with Bureau of Land Mmanagement
land and contains one of California=s largest remaining old-growth Douglass-fir forests, as well
as several pristine stream systems. Originally acquired by the Angelo family, the Nature
Conservancy established a preserve in 1959 and in 1994 transferred title to the University of
California.
|
|
US Highway 101 is a major throughfare located adjacent to the South Fork Eel River
from its confluence with the mainstem to the community of Legget. Average daily number of
vehicles passing Garberville on Highway 101 is 6,400 (Calif. Dept. of Transportation
unpublished data, 1993).The number of vehicles peaks in July at 8,300 vehicles per day.
There is insufficient data to thoroughly assess the current condition of habitat in the South
Fork of the Eel River; however, some obvious statements can be made for the Eel River
watershed as a whole. Land management practices, including road building, logging, and rural
development, in combination with the flood events in 1955 and 1964, have caused considerable
impacts to sediment loads and have greatly impacted fish habitat. Current watershed conditions,
especially the density of roads, leave the basin at risk of further impacts to fish habitat when
another large flood event occurs. Some sub-watersheds contain better fish habitat than others.
Those sub-watersheds with fewer roads or where roads are well designed and maintained, can be
expected to suffer less impacts from the next large flood and thus may offer refugia of better fish habitat within the South Fork Eel River. (Bureau of Land Management South Fork Eel River
Watershed Analysis 1996).
|
|
|